Offtackle
Football news for every down
Competition Committee Proposes Expanding Practice Squads to 18 Players With Additional Protection
The proposal goes to ownership vote in Phoenix. Teams that develop young players would benefit most. The unintended consequence is more roster stasis at the bottom of depth charts.
Sunday, March 1, 2026
The NFL's competition committee met in Indianapolis this week during the combine, and several proposed rule changes are expected to go to a full ownership vote at the March league meetings in Phoenix. The most consequential of the proposals under discussion involves practice squad eligibility and the conditions under which teams can protect players from being signed away.
The current practice squad structure allows teams to carry 16 players, with specific exemptions for players with significant NFL experience. The proposal being discussed would expand the practice squad to 18 players while also modifying the protection rules to give teams one additional protected player per week. The motivation is straightforward: teams that develop young players are routinely losing those players to competitors who have identified them through film and are willing to elevate them immediately.
The change would have a secondary effect on roster strategy that is already being discussed by front office personnel at several clubs. A deeper protected practice squad changes the calculation for which players teams expose to the market during roster cuts. If you can protect two players instead of one, you're more willing to carry developmental players through the cut process knowing you have a reasonable chance of keeping them out of another organization's hands.
At the player level, the rule change is more complicated. Practice squad players who benefit from expanded protection are players who might otherwise have gotten an elevation or a chance to stick on an active roster. More protection means more roster stasis at the bottom of depth charts, which isn't uniformly good for players trying to establish careers.
The committee's recommendation carries significant weight but isn't binding. The owners who vote in Phoenix will have the final say, and at least one major ownership group has expressed reservations about the pace of rule changes affecting roster construction.